Global Trade
Scoring Guide: Summative Assessment

Single-page Print PDF

  Research/Investigation
Skills & Processes
Content Evidence & Support Communication & Presentation Conceptual Understanding
1. The research or investigation process, if evident, is ineffective.
  • The statement of the research topic or purpose is not evident, or is unclear
  • Sources of information are inadequate or non-credible.
  • Little information relevant to the topic is provided to support the research or investigative effort.
  • Analysis is not evident, or is ineffective.
  • The conclusions, if provided, are inadequate or inconsistent with the analysis.
  • Sources utilized may not be documented.
Minimal information is provided to support the topic.
  • Information may be irrelevant to the topic.
  • Most information is inaccurate, non-credible, or unverifiable.
  • The content and scope of information are inadequate for the topic.
  • Sources of information are not communicated.
The presentation is not effective.
  • The presentation is not appropriate for the purpose or topic.
  • Ideas are poorly developed and disorganized.
  • Errors in sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, or usage seriously interfere with the clarity and effectiveness of the communication.
Minimal conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated.
  • Concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are seldom or never used.
  • Little or no logic or language appropriate to the topic is evident.
  • Few, if any, examples are used to illustrate the concepts presented.
  • Conclusions, if offered, are largely illogical or inaccurate.
2. The research or investigative process is somewhat ineffective.
  • The statement of the research topic or purpose is somewhat vague, and the significance of the topic unclear.
  • Sources of information are somewhat inadequate or non-credible.
  • Some information relevant to the topic is provided to support the research or investigative effort.
  • Incomplete analysis is evident.
  • The conclusions are somewhat inadequate or inconsistent with the analysis.
  • Sources utilized are poorly documented.
Some supporting evidence is provided to support the topic, but it is inadequate.
  • Some information relevant to the task is employed.
  • Some information is inaccurate, non-credible, or unverifiable.
  • The content and scope of information are somewhat inadequate for the purpose.
  • Sources of information may be inadequately communicated.
The presentation is somewhat effective.
  • The presentation is somewhat appropriate for the purpose and topic.
  • Ideas are partially developed but somewhat disorganized.
  • Errors in sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, or usage may sometimes interfere with the clarity and effectiveness of the communication.
Some conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated.
  • Some concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are used.
  • Some use of logic and language appropriate to the topic is evident.
  • Some examples are used to illustrate the concepts presented.
  • Conclusions may be somewhat illogical or inaccurate.
3. The research or investigative process is effective.
  • The research topic or purpose is clearly stated, and the significance of the topic is apparent.
  • Most of the sources of information are adequate and credible.
  • Information relevant to the topic is organized to support the research or investigative effort.
  • Analysis is evident.
  • The conclusions are consistent with the analysis.
  • Sources utilized are adequately documented.
Adequate information is provided to support the topic.
  • Information relevant to the topic is provided.
  • Although minor inaccuracies may be present, most information is accurate, credible, and verifiable.
  • The content and scope of information are adequate for the topic.
  • Most sources of information are adequately communicated.
The presentation is effective.
  • The presentation is appropriate for the purpose and topic.
  • Ideas are adequately developed and generally well organized.
  • Errors in sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, or usage seldom interfere with the clarity and effectiveness of the communication.
Adequate conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated.
  • Concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are accurately used.
  • Logic and language appropriate to the topic are evident.
  • Examples are used to adequately illustrate the concepts presented.
  • Conclusions are generally logical and accurate.
4. The research or investigative process is exceptionally effective.
  • The research topic or purpose is clearly stated, and the significance of the topic is apparent.
  • Sources of information are well chosen and very credible.
  • Information relevant to the topic is purposefully selected and well organized to support the research or investigative effort.
  • Thorough analysis is evident.
  • The conclusions are insightful and consistent with the analysis.
  • Sources utilized are completely and thoroughly documented.
Information to support the topic is carefully selected and skillfully utilized.
  • Information highly relevant to the topic is provided.
  • Information is detailed, accurate, credible, and verifiable.
  • The content and scope of information fully support the topic.
  • Sources of information are fully and clearly communicated.
The presentation is highly effective.
  • The presentation is highly appropriate for the purpose and topic.
  • Ideas are thoroughly developed and well organized.
  • Sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, and usage enhance the clarity and effectiveness of the communication.
Superior conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated.
  • Concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are skillfully applied.
  • Logic and language appropriate to the topic are present throughout.
  • Examples used enhance understanding of the concepts presented.
  • Conclusions are logical and accurate, and may be insightful.